February 15, 2011
 Past Guidance and
Present Decisions

 Appreciating God's
Unfolding Calls
    
Archive | Subscribe to Nehemiah Notes | Blaine Smith's Books | Home

Jennifer is considering a job offer that seems good from every angle except one: sheís uncertain how to reconcile it with a past experience of guidance.

When Jennifer was offered her current job as a legal secretary in Sacramento, she was living in Tallahassee. She was a new Christian then, and anxious to be certain about Godís will.

On a balmy May afternoon, she spent several hours walking on a Gulf beach, praying for Godís guidance. After praying for about an hour, she felt a surge of conviction that God wanted her to accept the offer. This wonderful feeling of assurance stayed with her for another hour or so, as she continued to walk and pray. That period of inspiration was the deciding point for Jennifer, and she resolved to make the move and take the job. She has thought back to that time often while in Sacramento, and taken reassurance that she is where God wants her to be.

Now Jennifer has been offered a new job with a law firm in Denver. She would like to accept the offer. Itís a better match for her talents than her present position, and provides a salary boost as well. Jennifer likes the attorney who wants to hire her, and believes she would work comfortably with him.

Yet Jennifer fears she would be disobeying God by leaving Sacramento. Although she has prayed much about it, she hasnít had an experience of inspiration similar to the one in Tallahassee. She has seen many practical reasons why she should make this move. She wonders if God may be guiding her through them, and if itís okay to base her decision on these factors alone. But the lack of a definite sense of call to take this step is unsettling to her. Is she obliged to stay in Sacramento until God clearly tells her to leave?

A Common Predicament

Many Christians experience a dilemma like Jenniferís.  They struggle with how to integrate past guidance that God has given them with new insights theyíve gained into their potential, interests, and emerging opportunities. Are they locked into their past understanding of Godís will? Does it present it a binding call upon them? Or are they free to consider a new direction for their life?

Some, like Jennifer, have had an episode of past guidance dramatic enough that they wonder if they must stay committed to it until God clearly tells them to change course. Many others, who cannot recall a specific experience of guidance, still have lived with an understanding of Godís will for their life for so long that they feel uneasy considering any other alternatives.

Iíve known more than a few Christians who, when they were young--in junior or senior high school, or even earlier--grew convinced that God wanted them to devote their life to a certain career, yet in college found that this option was not a good match for their potential. Discovering that there is a disparity between what they believe God wills for them, and what is realistic for them educationally, is shattering to the idealism of some Christian students. Even harder for some is finding that their own interests have changed, and that they are now attracted to a different vocational dream than the one theyíve long assumed was Godís will.

I have personally gone through two periods of career reassessment where I had some difficulty letting go of a past understanding of Godís will. For over a year I grappled with whether to shift from a career in music to one in pastoring and teaching. I did decide to make this change, but then, several years later, wrestled with whether to leave a pastoral position on a church staff to begin Nehemiah Ministries. In both cases I had grown so accustomed to a particular identity--first as a musical performer, then as a pastor--that I worried I might be going against Godís will by making the change.

One thing that complicated my decision to leave church ministry was that a pastor friend had told me sincerely that he believed God had created me to be a preacher. I esteemed this man so highly that his advice seemed almost like a divine revelation to me. While I know he simply meant to encourage me, and not lock me in, by sharing this conviction, it still became a hurdle I had to jump in deciding to shift from church work to resource ministry.

Binding Calls and Unfolding Calls

Christians who find it hard to reconcile past guidance with a new direction that seems right for their life usually respond in one of several ways. Some feel compelled to wait for God to give them further guidance so convincing that theyíll have no doubt he wants them to make the change. Others move ahead without such guidance, but experience plenty of guilt in the process.

Still others are spurred to re-examine their basic assumptions about guidance, to see whether these have been realistic. Some discover that theyíve been operating with unreasonable ideas about how God guides--which have led them to read too much into past experiences of guidance, and to expect too much guidance for present decisions. This reassessment is liberating for them, for they realize that God is giving them greater freedom to take new directions than they had assumed.

When Christians like Jennifer find that a step that now seems best for their life seems to conflict with past guidance from God, they often are thinking of guidance as a static process. Theyíre assuming that God reveals his will for some area of our life once and for all, and thatís it; weíre then locked into that understanding for a long time, perhaps permanently.

Scripture, though, pictures Godís guidance as a dynamic process. He seldom reveals very much about his will for our future, but lets us discover it step by step as we move along. And purely practical insights we gain into ourselves and our opportunities are often as important in understanding his will as our more dramatic experiences of guidance. While God can give us a binding, non-negotiable call to do something, his calls--to vocations especially--are often unfolding, and best understood only as we are in motion. Appreciating this aspect of how God guides us helps us greatly in understanding the relationship of past guidance to present decisions.

Paulís Apostolic Call--The Exception or the Rule?

Scripture does give examples of Godís mandating someone to follow a vocation permanently, as a life commitment. The most familiar example, for most of us, is Godís calling Paul to be an Apostle. Paul begins most of his letters with a reference to this call, declaring that he is ďcalled to be an apostle,Ē or is ďan apostle by the will of GodĒ (Acts 1:1, 5; 1 Cor 1:1; 2 Cor 1:1; Gal 1:1; Eph 1:1; Col 1:1; 1 Tim 1:1; 2 Tim 1:1; Tit 1:1-3). He clearly understood this role as an indelible stamp from God upon his life. Most likely, he received this commission by direct revelation from God during his Damascus Road experience.

Many Christians assume that Paulís apostolic call is a model for how they should personally expect to receive Godís guidance. They think that if theyíre spiritually mature enough, and sufficiently alert to God, he will give them a call to follow a certain career thatís as clear and distinct as the one he gave Paul. He will then expect them to stay on this course until further notice, even for life. This same assumption leads many to believe that theyíve actually received such a call if, like Jennifer, theyíve experienced a dramatic or unusual episode of guidance.

Paul, however, never claimed that his experience of calling was normative for other Christians. Nowhere in his writings does he teach that anyone should expect such guidance in career decisions, nor do we find him anywhere counseling someone to seek this level of guidance. Rather, he encouraged Christians, in determining Godís will for their lives, to consider practical factors--such as their gifts, the opportunities open to them and the counsel of other people.

Paulís Typical Experience with Guidance

But how would Paul counsel someone like Jennifer, who believes she has been called by God to be where she is, but now sees compelling reasons to take a new direction with her life? I believe we find an important clue in an episode from Paulís life described in Acts 16:8-40. It begins with Paulís receiving guidance from God dramatic enough that he regards it as a call. Yet at several points he responds to this call differently than he did to the one to be an apostle, even revising his understanding of it as he moves ahead.

One night, weíre told, ďPaul had a vision of a man of Macedonia standing and begging him, ĎCome over to Macedonia and help us.í After Paul had seen the vision, we got ready at once to leave for Macedonia, concluding that God had called us to preach the gospel to themĒ (vv. 9-10).

Paul has a vision--possibly a dream--of a man in Macedonia pleading for his help. Paul and his companions take this incident as a revelation, concluding that God is calling them to go to Macedonia and evangelize. Interestingly, this is the only occasion in the New Testament, outside of references to Paulís apostolic commission, where he is described as ďcalledĒ by God to do something.

We would logically assume that, since Paul received such exceptional guidance to go to Macedonia, his experience once he arrives will parallel his vision exactly: heíll find a man ministering there who is desperate for his aid, and will devote himself to helping this man evangelize the Macedonians. We look in vain, however, throughout the detailed description of Paulís visit to Macedonia in Acts 16, for any reference to this man.

Instead, soon after arriving in Macedonia, Paul and his party encounter a group of women praying by a river, and one remarkable woman, Lydia, leading them. Paul persuades Lydia to become a Christian. She then convinces Paul and his team to stay at her home. The fact that they accept Lydiaís offer is good evidence that Paul has concluded he isnít going to find the man of his vision, for otherwise he probably would be holding out for the opportunity to lodge with him.

Paul, then, makes a significant revision of his ďcall,Ē and decides to minister with Lydia and develop a church based in her home. Whatís most interesting is that, while Paulís initial guidance to go to Macedonia came through a supernatural vision, his change of direction resulted from practical insights--his discovery that Lydia and her friends were available for ministry, and that the man of his vision, apparently, wasnít to be found. Paul seemed to place as much weight on such practical factors in understanding Godís will as he did upon direct revelation!

One other logical assumption we might make is that, since Paul was led to Macedonia by a vision, he would be obliged to stay there indefinitely--at least until God gave him equally dramatic guidance to leave. Yet after a tumultuous episode with some Macedonian businessmen, who fear that Paulís ministry is hurting them financially, the town officials ask Paul to leave--and he agrees. In all, Paul stays in Macedonia probably only several months. And his decision to move on is based not on further dramatic guidance, but on purely practical considerations.

Godís Guidance Through Our Filters

From Paulís Macedonian call, then, we learn several vital lessons about guidance. First, the fact that we might receive dramatic or supernatural guidance doesnít necessarily mean we will fully understand the content of that guidance. Nor does it mean that God has necessarily spoken his final word to us on a matter. Some revising of our understanding may be needed as we move ahead. We interpret Godís guidance, like anything else, through our own filters; we may grasp some parts of it correctly, but misunderstand others, and need to rethink our conclusions as he enlightens us further.

I suspect, too, that Paulís Macedonian vision--as is typical with dreams--was at least partly symbolic. God may have intended it more as inspiration to get him moving in the right direction, than as a revelation of exact events that would take place. We shouldnít discount the possibility that an inspiration or epiphany we experience is more symbolic than factual. It may be Godís means of moving us forward, yet not a precise revelation of what will take place, or what will be required of us. Our future will still take many twists and turns that arenít apparent yet, and we will need to look to God often for fresh guidance about what to do.

Paulís experience also teaches us an important lesson about the role of practical thinking in guidance, and its interplay with more dramatic experiences of guidance we might have.  While God may direct us on occasion through supernatural guidance, he more typically reveals the details of his will for our lives through practical information. He has given us a mind and expects us to use it! Logical conclusions we reach, through observing the circumstances of life, can be at least as important in understanding Godís will as the insight that comes through exceptional guidance. And while God may lead us to take an important step with our life through a special call, he may also expect us, through practical insight, to modify our understanding of the call as we move forward.

Paulís experience also demonstrates that Godís calls can have their time limits. In the case of Paulís visit to Macedonia, this limit was fairly brief. This suggests that even if God gives us a dramatic call to do something, the time may come when he expects us to make a practical decision to change directions. While he can then give us a special call to move on, itís just as likely that heíll expect us to simply use good judgment in making this choice.

Reaching the Right Conclusions

Paulís call to go to Macedonia, then, differed significantly from his apostolic call. When God called Paul to become an apostle, it appears God told him once and for all that he was to fulfill this role for life. This call conferred a permanent status on Paul. Paulís Macedonian call, on the other hand, was less precise, and served mainly to propel him ahead. Only as he moved forward, did the nature of his responsibility in Macedonia become clear, along with the time commitment involved.

Scripture, then, pictures two types of calls God bestows on Christians--the one clear and binding, the other unfolding.

But how should we determine whether guidance we receive is meant to place a binding call on us, or is part of an unfolding one? The answer, I believe, has to do with the clarity and intensity of the guidance. Paulís call to apostleship likely came through his Damascus Road experience. On Damascus Road, and in the days following, Paul heard Godís audible voice clearly and distinctly. Paul had no question about who was speaking to him, or about the details of what God was instructing him to do. Moreover, the event was remarkably intense, leaving Paul blinded for several days. God also provided confirmation of his guidance, and further instruction, through Ananias, whom he commissioned to heal Paul of his blindness and counsel him.

Paulís Macedonian vision, on the other hand, was a much briefer, less intense experience. The guidance it conveyed was also less clear than that in his Damascus Road experience. Luke (the author of Acts) notes that after Paul had the vision, those in his party concluded that God had called them to preach the gospel in Macedonia. The fact that they reached a conclusion about what to do indicates they discussed Paulís vision and its implications; the vision required some interpretation, in other words.

For most of us, even our most dramatic episodes of guidance are usually more similar to Paulís Macedonian vision than to his Damascus Road experience. If that. While we may occasionally have a dream so unusual that it seems like a revelation from God, our guidance experiences are more typically like Jenniferís on the beach. We have an inspiration--a ďEureka-Iíve-found-itĒ moment of insight into what to do. Yet we havenít heard an audible voice, or experienced some other lucid revelation of guidance. We merely have had an impression of what God wants us to do.

God may be giving us important guidance through this impression, to be sure. Still, itís an impression, coming through our own sensors, and subject to all the human factors that can skew our understanding. Itís always a safe rule of thumb in such cases to assume that our grasp of Godís will is partial at best, and will need some revision as we move forward.

We should expect that if God gives us a binding call, his guidance will be so distinct and emphatic that weíll have no doubt he has spoken, and no question about what heís telling us to do. Less intense experiences of guidance, such as a moment of inspiration or a dream, should be regarded as part of an unfolding call. They are part of the enlightenment God is using to steer us in the right direction. Yet we will still need plenty of further guidance as we put our feet in motion.

Staying Flexible and Staying Faithful

Nothing weíre saying about the importance of staying flexible with respect to guidance, however, gives us a license to break commitments to others or to be ďflighty.Ē Any time we choose to take a fresh direction in our life, we need to give our new situation a fair chance before changing course again. And we should always consider carefully if weíve made commitments to others--explicit or implicit--that should be fulfilled before we allow ourselves permission to move on.

Some vocational roles require you to promise to serve in them for a specific period of time. These include many missionary and ministry positions, where others may be depending heavily upon you to keep your commitment. If you have made such a pledge of service, you should only consider leaving early under compelling circumstances (a serious health problem, for instance), or if those whoíve employed you are willing to release you.

Yet even when weíve given a situation a fair chance, and wouldnít be violating commitments by moving on, we may still wonder if we must remain bound to a past understanding of Godís will. Appreciating how God gives unfolding calls can keep us from restricting ourselves unnecessarily in such a case.

Jennifer, for instance, has certainly given her job in Sacramento a reasonable commitment of time, and isnít being unfaithful in considering a change. I believe Paul would counsel her to take the job in Denver. He would tell her that the guidance she received to move to Sacramento was important. Yet it wasnít meant to lock her in forever, nor was it Godís final word on her career. Moving to Sacramento was necessary, in fact, for her to be in a position to then receive the offer from Denver, and to be able to understand why this new opportunity is now right for her.

I believe that Paul would counsel any of us who are in a situation similar to Jenniferís to be flexible and open to the possibility that God has new horizons for us. Paul himself showed remarkable flexibility in his odyssey described in Acts 16.

His example demonstrates, too, that itís Godís nature to bring new adventure into our lives. During our lifetime, he gives us many fresh experiences and challenges, to stimulate us to grow and to realize our potential for Christ. A certain desire for adventure is essential if weíre to be alert and open to the best opportunities God presents us.

We can have too much wanderlust, to be sure. We can yearn for fresh experience so much that we have difficulty keeping commitments, and fail to enjoy the simple routines of life.

Yet the opposite danger is equally real--that we donít desire adventure enough, become too stuck in the inertia of life, and resist change. Paul, I believe, demonstrates a healthy balance in the extensive picture of his life in the New Testament. He longed to grow and to experience all the new vistas God had for him. Yet he was equally determined to be faithful to his commitments, and to find joy in lifeís ordinary pleasures.

We should pray that God gives us this same balance in our own outlook. It will keep us pliable and open to his best, as his plan for our life unfolds.
     

 *    *    *    *    *    *    *    *    *    *    *    *    *    *    *    *    * 
   
Nehemiah Notes is available monthly by e-mail.

Do you have comments about Nehemiah Notes? E-mail Blaine or use the comments box on our guestbook page.

Copyright 2011 M. Blaine Smith.
Please see our
copyright page for permission to reprint.

  
Nehemiah Notes Archive | About Nehemiah Notes | Home
Books by Blaine Smith | About Nehemiah Ministries and Blaine Smith
Copyright 2011 M. Blaine Smith
PO Box 448, Damascus, MD 20872
E-mail Blaine Smith
   
 

 

Louis Vuitton Outlet Louis Vuitton Outlet Michael Kors Outlet coach outlet jordan 3 wolf grey louis vuitton outlet jordan 3 wolf grey louis vuitton outlet sport blue 3s retro jordans for sale lebron 12 Foamposites Louis Vuitton Outlet sport blue 14s cheap jordans louis vuitton outlet wolf grey 3s wolf grey 3s louis vuitton outlet lebron 11